Unit 1 Portfolio
Source 1: "A Pencil Shop, for Texting the Old-Fashioned Way" Source Analysis
This article highlights a small business in Lower Manhattan that sells almost solely pencils. The author
discusses the store owner, Caroline Weaver, and her love for pencils. She also addresses the inventory of the
store, which as previously mentioned is mostly pencils at very inexpensive prices but all with unique characteristics.
The article was posted to the New York Times, and I think it was engineered to interest inhabitants of New York City
looking for somewhere to stop by in their free time or maybe tourists that pass through looking for a souvenir
from their trip. It is an artistic and wordy piece, and I think it was also meant to be an enjoyable read to evoke
humor and curiosity. This fits into my topic of how technology has changed our modes of communication because at one point
in time, the only way to communicate with others not standing directly in front of you was to put pencil or
pen to paper and write them a letter. It could take days to weeks to months for people to get
your message. Obviously now we can send a message to a friend, and they will receive it almost
immediately, but people did not always have this luxury. There is a lost art in writing on paper, scribbling
notes, and sharpening a pencil. Today, we have iPads and touch-screen computers to write on, so we no
longer get a small boost of serotonin picking out a fun and colorful pencil to use until it is only an inch
long or clicking a fresh pen for the first time. Even the pencils one might buy in Caroline Weaver's store
would likely just sit in a desk after their purchase. Has the convenience of technology taken the joy out of
writing a note to a friend or loved one?
Young, Molly. “A Pencil Shop, for Texting the Old-Fashioned Way.” The New York Time,
The New York Times, 19 May 2015, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/21/fashion/a-pencil-shop-for-
texting-the-old-fashioned-way.html
Source 2: "How Digital Media Has Changed Communications"
This article is a university-published blog that discusses the ways that technology and the media have changed the way that we communicate locally and internationally. It has impacted marketing and advertising, business operations, and news distribution. The article gives the example that, "For businesses, technology has improved collaboration, costs and co-worker communication. Today, work teams have several options to communicate without being face to face, including by email, instant and direct messaging and group collaboration software". Technology has improved staff communication, employee productivity, thus expediting business efficiency. Technology is a blessing, it has allowed for advancements in manufacturing and medicine and travel on top of labor efficiency. However, with the large section of technology that is media, information travels fast, sometimes even too fast. Additionally, once something is written and posted on the internet, it never goes away. The media also contains an abundance of false information, and sometimes it can be hard to determine what is true and what isn't. It has also been blamed for rising cases of depression and isolation and has been deemed the main problem for lacking human connection. These beliefs are how this source fits into my inquiry. The rise of technology has done so much good for our world like allowing for world-wide communication and connection, but it has also haddetrimental effects on peoples' mental healths and the health of the planet due to research and productions. This leads me to wonder, has technology done more good than harm for our world?
“How Digital Media Has Changed Communications: Carlow Today & Tomorrow.” Carlow Today & Tomorrow |
Creating a More Just and Merciful World, 10 Dec. 2021, https://blog.carlow.edu/2021/12/16/how-digital-media
has-changed-communication/.
Source 3: "From Knowledgeable to Knowledge-Able" - Michael Wesch - TedxKC
This source is different from my others because it is a video and not a piece of text. It is one of the most
credible and professional sources that I used for my inquiry. The video is an 18 minute long Ted Talk by
Michael Wesch, a professor at Kansas State University. He talks about many different topics in the video,
but there were several that stood out to me. Firstly, relating ack to my previous source talking about the
effect of the media on our society, Wesch discussed how in his lectures, students are often preoccupied in
his classes with social medias and not really paying attention. Students admitted that they were
consistently scrolling on Facebook in class, or weren't motivated to do the required readings, or even
bought the $100 textbook for class that they never ended up opening. Social media has taken over so many
realms of our lives and provides more entertainment for impressionable people than important yet maybe
dull topics, especially in school. The media affects a person the minute that they are exposed; Wesch used
the example of a Dove commercial of a little girl getting bombarded by the media about the "correct" hair
color, waist size, skin texture, diet and exercise. Like previously stated, technology has had a positive
effect on the world, like another example in the video of a software developed by four Kenyans that has
saved hundreds of thousands of lives in wars and destruction. However, we cannot neglect that though
seemingly a minute disturbance, the distraction of the media in a setting like college, which is intended for
education, growth and discovery, has a serious and lasting impact. It distracts from the true purpose of an
educational which is to become impactful and positive members of society. Was school a more well-worth
investment when teachers wrote life-lessons on chalkboards and students wrote their ambitions on paper?
Wesch, Michael, and TedxTalks. “TEDxKC - Michael Wesch - From Knowledgeable to Knowledge-Able.” YouTube
, YouTube, 12 Oct. 2010, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeaAHv4UTI8.
Source 4: "Grammarly as Assistive Technology for Writing"
As students in college, we are constantly writing. Whether that be emails to professors or essays for classes, it is
important to be conscious of our grammar, spelling and punctuation. With modern technology, new platforms have been
created to assist students in any writing they do; Grammarly is a very popular example of one of these platforms. This
source is a post by an occupational therapy company commenting on Grammarly as a platform. it highlights Grammarly's
many functions like its ability to check grammar, spelling, sentence structure, vocabulary enhancement, detect plagiarism,
get performance statistics via email, and see definitions and synonyms via double-click. The platofrm not only acts as
a second set of eyes to proof-read your writing before sharing it with others, it also acts as a dictionary and thesaurus and
can be a learning tool to help students refresh their knowledge on writing rules. One of the few setbacks to a platform like
Grammarly is that it would only do the work for you and not teach you anything, however this one in specific contains
several educational features. Another small setback with this platform might be the opportunity to rely on it too heavily and
not utilize the years of knowledge we've gained in ELA and writing intensive classes about grammar and writing rules.
This is a general theme for technology and its modern "shortcuts"; it can be easy to rely on it too heavily. A previous
example in this blog was social media getting in the way of school because it is addicting and can easily be over-consumed
as a form of entertainment. This is similar in that it can be tempting to write a poor piece of text knowing that a platform
like Grammarly will fix all of your mistakes. This leads me to wonder, is it possible for us as a society to become worse
writers because of assistive-writing technologies?
Ford-Lanza, Alescia. “Grammarly as Assistive Technology for Writing.” Adapt, Adapt-and-Learn, 17 Nov. 2017, https://www.adaptandlearn.com/post/grammarly-as-assistive-technology-for-writing.




I like how despite each source covering very different topics related to technology, you tied them together through the development of potential research questions. This made for a very cohesive read. It makes a lot of sense that no one source would answer every question that might rise from it. I think it would be interesting to see if future research could begin to answer some of those questions, while simultaneously generating new questions.
ReplyDelete- Eleanor Czajkowski
Hey, I really like how well you tied the class theme of "writing and technology" into your writing. All of your sources fit really well together and its easy as a reader to understand what you're analyzing. -Max
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed how all of your articles connected with such wholesome topic of the truest form of writing which is actual writing. I particularly enjoyed the first source which really got into the importance of writing with your hands and how information can be so lost through technology.
ReplyDelete-Taylor Chen
I think your analysis for each source is very good! Each source you picked was credible and matched the topic at hand perfectly. I specifically enjoyed learning about the Grammarly source, as I know many people who use it and find it very helpful. However, i can definitely understand how people could rely too heavily on it and how that can actually make their own writing in the future worse.
ReplyDelete-Ava Chambers